Spoken discourse structure – William Labov
When a speaker talks for an extended period of time, we can say they are narrating.
A sociolinguist William Labov developed a structure known as narrative categories. These are six categories which appear in a narrative.
The way a language is spoken (and written) differs across individuals as well as across situations encountered by the same individual. Labov argued that such differences are not only normal but also necessary to a language’s functioning. Labov’s research demonstrates that linguistic variation is pervasive and highly structured, revealing regular patterns of co-occurrence between language forms, such as the pronunciation of a particular vowel, and social categories, such as socioeconomic classes.
Labov has
explored a wide range of linguistic phenomena within the variationist paradigm.
He has examined semantic and grammatical features, though the study of
phonological variation has predominated in his work. His research demonstrates
that linguistic variation is pervasive (especially of an unwelcome influence or physical effect)
spreading widely throughout an area or a group of people and highly
structured, revealing regular patterns of co-occurrence between language forms,
such as the pronunciation of a particular vowel, and social categories.
Semantics – Paul Grice
Grice is a British philosopher of
language. His work on the nature of meaning has influenced the philosophical
study of semantics.
Grice argued for an intention-based
theory of meaning, and was the first to illustrate the distinction between what
came to be called semantic and pragmatic meaning, that is, between what a
speaker’s utterance (or its utterance ‘type’) means in the abstract, and what
else a speaker can mean by uttering it in a particular context.
For example, the statement "Could
you open the door?" is not a question about the hearer's ability, nor is
it a factual statement in the indicative mood. It is actually an imperative
like "Will you (please) open the door?".
Paul could ask Sue ‘’Where has the
cream gone’’. Sue could then reply ‘’Cats drink cream’’. Though not said this
means that the couple have a cat, cats drink cream and therefore the cat has
probably drank the cream Paul is asking about.
Face Theory – Erving Goffman
–Positive = feeling valued & appreciated
–Negative
= the desire to feel independent & not to be imposed upon
He asked himself ‘why people behave the way they do?’ –
instead of using scientific methods he used the act of simple observation to
explain society. Goffman’s work allows us to have an understanding of society's
ideas, values, and beliefs through the behaviour of the individual. It is
through his findings that we can better understand situational behaviour.
Goffman stated that people could be seen as performers in a
theatre. Actors in a play portray a certain image to the audience, and so
people in society also put forth, in their behaviour, a certain image or
impression to other people. For example, in church we may be quiet, respectful.
Semantics - Ferdinand de Saussure
Saussure said a sign is a unit used to represent and convey
meaning. A sign is arbitrary (based on random choice or personal whim, rather
than any reason or system) because "the bond between the signifier and the
signified is arbitrary". This means the meanings that people attach to
signs is subjective, people can apply different meanings to one sign. This link
is also a matter of societal convention. Signs gain meanings from the
associations we give them as a society.
For example, a red traffic lights doesn’t directly tell us
to stop but we know to because of the meanings we associate with it as a
society.
A crossing sign doesn’t literally tell us there is a crossing
ahead however the image of the man allows us to know this and the red informs
us to be alert.
Your notes are very detailed Amelia. Well done! How do these theories apply to the Language Levels?
ReplyDeleteAJK